Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces the Nested Episodic State Topology (NEST), a graph-theoretic framework that models cognition through structured state formations and transformations, emphasizing the representation of concepts, episodes, and contexts as typed, weighted graphs. It distinguishes between durable belief graphs and capacity-limited working-memory graphs, detailing how transient structures interact with stored knowledge through belief-update operators. Key results include a toolkit for graph operations and diagnostics that unify various cognitive phenomena under a single ontology, paving the way for future empirical and computational explorations in cognitive modeling.
A unified graph-theoretic framework reveals how cognitive states can be structured and transformed, challenging traditional empirical models of cognition.
We present NEST (Nested Episodic State Topology), a foundational graph-theoretic representational ontology for modeling cognition as structured state formation and transformation rather than as a finished empirical model. Concepts, episodes, percepts, and task contexts are represented as typed, weighted graphs whose nodes may carry internal subgraph payloads; edges are typed under six relation classes -- causal, containment, temporal, associative, evidential, and spatial. Durable belief graphs are separated from capacity-limited working-memory graphs that may host transient non-belief content. WM-belief grounding, conflict catalogs, and belief-update operators specify how transient structure is tested against stored knowledge and how belief is revised. A reusable operator toolkit -- activation, graph-property functionals, working-memory transitions, awareness and trajectory functionals, and belief update -- organizes the formal core. Derived diagnostics such as fragmentation, involvement, signed evaluation, coherence, and active conflict define familiar phenomena in the same ontology; self-related processing is modeled through designated self-image subgraphs within belief. Subsequent sections instantiate this core without new primitives: phenomena signatures, a task-instantiation schema for action selection and failure modes, and compatibility mappings that embed ACT-R, Soar, Sigma, the Common Model of Cognition, Global Workspace Theory, semantic networks, Theory-Theory, and chunking as constrained regions of one language. Mappings constitute the culminating technical section; discussion addresses scope, limitations, and open research directions. The contribution is intentionally foundational: a transparent representational substrate for later empirical, computational, and domain-specific work.
