Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the concept of physically accessible decision-making (PADM) and establishes a measurement-access risk frontier that quantifies the Bayes-optimal target risk under various operational constraints. The findings reveal that automation cannot fully mitigate decision uncertainty through computation alone, highlighting the necessity for expanded access and other compensatory strategies to bridge gaps in available records. The authors demonstrate the application of PADM through a chemistry-aware candidate-ranking audit, showcasing its effectiveness in identifying target-specific audit value and residual oracle gaps before deployment.
Automation can't eliminate decision uncertainty without expanding access to physical records, revealing critical limits in autonomous scientific control.
Rapidly scaling autonomous science is limited not only by algorithms, compute or data volume, but by which physical records a platform exposes before action. We formulate physically accessible decision-making (PADM) and a measurement-access risk frontier: the Bayes-optimal target risk minimized over records realizable under cost, bandwidth, latency, disturbance, memory and actuation constraints. The frontier gives a no-free-autonomy limit: automation cannot collapse decision uncertainty by computation alone; an optimal controller cannot remove target components absent from its record, and closing that gap requires expanded access, auditing, tolerated disturbance, slower operation or restricted deployment. In monitored feedback, displacement-only control remains exposed to a hidden switching force, whereas a finite-bandwidth cue recovers part of the missing projection before action. A chemistry-aware candidate-ranking audit with a 1000-target stress panel, Gaussian sensing, hidden-regime decisions and cost-aware/thermodynamic channel selection provide reproducible checks. PADM identifies target-specific audit value and residual oracle gaps before deployment.
