Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the Relative Probability Association Metric (RPAM), an upstream evaluation metric designed to assess associations in generative language models (LMs) by analyzing embeddings and continuation probabilities. The authors demonstrate that RPAM correlates strongly with real-world associations and biases observed in generated text across various LMs, including Mistral-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B, and GPT-2. By outperforming existing downstream metrics, RPAM provides a more generalizable and principled approach to understanding biases in language models.
RPAM reveals a robust connection between upstream evaluations and real-world biases, outperforming traditional downstream metrics in assessing language model associations.
Language models (LMs) exhibit problematic biases, such as stereotypes. Effectively analyzing and mitigating such biases requires accurate and generalizable evaluation methods of the underlying associations. Some existing approaches focus on downstream metrics that analyze associations in generated text. Since generated text content can vary drastically across LMs, such metrics often require specialized evaluation datasets, which limits the generalization of such downstream metrics. In contrast, upstream metrics examine LMs at the fundamental level of embeddings or continuation probabilities, enabling principled association analyses across LMs. Yet, to date, no upstream metric for generative LMs has uncovered a strong relationship with real-world associations, including those measured in generated text. To address this gap, we introduce the Relative Probability Association Metric (RPAM), an association evaluation metric for generative LMs. For three LMs of different quality of language generation and purpose (Mistral-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B, and GPT-2) and well-studied evaluation datasets (WEAT-WS, Bellezza, WS-353, and SST2), we find a strong relationship between upstream RPAM measurements and corresponding implicit and explicit associations observed in humans, as well as biases measured downstream with LM-specific tasks, outperforming prior record values where applicable.
UW