Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces geometric causal models (GCMs), a novel framework that leverages the symmetries inherent in structured data to facilitate causal inference in scenarios where data is dependent, such as spatial and network data. By applying group theory and ergodic theory, the authors establish methods for causal identification and estimation, demonstrating that GCMs can recover traditional i.i.d. causal models while also revealing new causal structures. A key application of this framework is the development of a causal model for DNA that integrates deep functional genomics and DNA language models to estimate the effects of genetic variation, validated through semisynthetic data experiments.
By harnessing the power of symmetries in structured data, geometric causal models reveal new pathways for causal inference that traditional methods overlook.
Scientists often seek to draw causal inferences from structured data that is not independently and identically distributed, such as spatial data, network data, or molecular data. We develop geometric causal models (GCMs), a framework for causal inference from dependent data that exploits underlying symmetries of the data generating process. For example, in spatial data, we consider processes that are symmetric under translations, or in graph data, symmetric under permutations of the nodes. We show how symmetries, formalized with group theory, can enable causal identification and estimation. We deploy ergodic theory for amenable groups to establish identification, and combine geometric deep learning with scalable Bayesian inference for estimation. We recover i.i.d. causal models and do-calculus when the data is a sequence and the symmetry is permutation equivariance, and find novel types of causal models when we use alternate structures and symmetries. As an example, we construct a causal model that satisfies the symmetries of DNA. This GCM enables new estimators for the effects of genetic variation, combining deep functional genomics models to describe outcomes and DNA language models to describe propensities. We illustrate on semisynthetic data.
