Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the fairness of machine learning algorithms used in Anti-Money Laundering (AML) by employing counterfactual methods to analyze the impact of sensitive features on model predictions. By utilizing the synthetic IBM AMLSim dataset and enhancing it with additional features related to account country and behavior, the study finds that models benefiting most from these features exhibit greater fairness violations. The results highlight a significant trade-off between predictive accuracy and fairness, emphasizing the need for systematic fairness evaluations in AML systems.
Models that improve predictive accuracy in AML can simultaneously exacerbate fairness violations, revealing a critical trade-off that demands attention.
The application of machine learning-based predictive algorithms to Anti-Money Laundering (AML) has grown rapidly, driven by the vast volume of financial transaction data available to banks. These algorithms are typically trained not only on transactional data but also on sensitive client information, which may raise fairness concerns. Despite this, AML detection systems remain largely underexplored from a fairness perspective, even though deeper analytical methods based on counterfactuals are now available. Such techniques enable the decomposition of the direct and indirect effects of potentially sensitive features on model predictions, thereby supporting the evaluation of whether their influence is acceptable from a fairness perspective. Closing this gap, we consider the synthetic IBM AMLSim transaction dataset and construct additional features of the country of an account and its average behaviour. This improves the predictive performance of diverse machine learning models, ranging from baseline decision trees to state-of-the-art graph neural networks. We assess the potential unfairness associated with these features through a counterfactual, path-specific effect analysis. This reveals that fairness violations tend to be more pronounced for models whose predictive performance benefits the most from the extended features. Such a finding highlights a concrete instance of the trade-off between predictive accuracy and fairness in AML applications, thus underscoring the urgency of a systematic fairness analysis in such critical domains.
