Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the capabilities of asymmetric trust in distributed systems, revealing that while it allows for a broader range of tolerable failure scenarios, it does not enhance the solvability of tasks requiring depth two or more, such as reliable broadcast or consensus. The authors demonstrate that any task solvable under these conditions can also be managed by a suitably designed symmetric quorum system. Their findings are substantiated through a compiler that effectively transforms asymmetric quorum systems into symmetric ones, establishing the limitations of asymmetric trust in practical applications.
Asymmetric trust expands failure tolerance but fails to enhance the solvability of complex distributed tasks beyond what symmetric systems can achieve.
Asymmetric trust generalizes classical symmetric quorum systems by allowing each process to specify its own failure assumptions. While this flexibility enables tolerance of strictly more failure scenarios, it is not known if, in these cases, it is actually possible to solve distributed tasks, and if so, which. We answer this question using the depth hierarchy for asymmetric trust (Amores-Sesar et al., OPODIS~'25), which characterizes how much a process must rely on others to solve a task. We prove that asymmetric trust does not increase the solvability of tasks requiring depth two or more, such as reliable broadcast or consensus. Specifically, for any Byzantine asymmetric quorum system, every failure scenario that permits solving a task requiring depth at least two can also be tolerated by a suitably constructed Byzantine symmetric quorum system. We show this via a compiler that transforms asymmetric quorum systems into symmetric ones. The additional failure patterns tolerated exclusively by asymmetric trust correspond to scenarios in which only simpler tasks requiring depth one or less (such as consistent broadcast) can be solved. We further prove that this result is tight in the depth hierarchy, meaning that there exist no compilers that produce symmetric quorum systems that are valid also in failure scenarios where correct processes have depths one or less. Our results clarify the precise power of asymmetric trust. While it strictly enlarges the set of tolerable failure patterns, it does not provide additional strength for solving tasks requiring depth two or higher.
