Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This survey maps the evolution of recommender systems towards autonomous, interactive agents by introducing a unified taxonomy based on autonomy levels and three core paradigms: agent-assisted recommendation, agent-as-recommender, and agent-as-user-simulator. It critically analyzes how these paradigms leverage various agentic architectures to enhance system components like profiles and workflows, while also addressing the limitations of current evaluation methodologies in capturing reasoning quality and user experience. By identifying open challenges such as lifelong user modeling and trustworthiness, the paper lays a foundational framework for advancing the development of more reliable and human-aligned recommendation agents.
A unified taxonomy reveals how agentic architectures can transform recommender systems into more autonomous and interactive entities.
The rapid integration of large language model-based agents into recommender systems has driven a shift from static, ranking-based pipelines toward autonomous and interactive systems that can reason, plan, and act. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of this emerging landscape by introducing a unified taxonomy grounded in the level of autonomy and three core paradigms of agentic recommender systems: agent-assisted recommendation, agent-as-recommender, and agent-as-user-simulator. The autonomy framework organizes existing methods along increasing capabilities in proactivity, context awareness, interaction flexibility, and adaptivity. Building on this framework, the survey analyzes how each paradigm adopts different agentic architectures and how agents enhance key components such as profiles, memory, tool use, workflows, and optimization mechanisms. We further examine evaluation methodologies for agentic recommendation, covering automated metrics, LLM-based judging, and simulation-based assessment, and discuss their limitations in capturing reasoning quality, user experience, and system behavior. Beyond existing evaluation protocols, we further discuss unresolved issues in evaluating agentic recommender systems, including trajectory-level assessment, agent contribution analysis, and calibration of user simulation. Lastly, the survey outlines open challenges in lifelong user modeling, contextual abstraction, multimodal alignment, controllability, trustworthiness, privacy, scalability, and efficiency. Together, these analyses establish a unified foundation for understanding the current progress of agentic recommender systems and highlight promising opportunities for developing more autonomous, reliable, and human-aligned recommendation agents.
NUS