Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the distribution of reinforcement learning (RL) adaptation across transformer layers in large language models (LLMs), revealing that training a single layer can achieve most of the performance improvements typically associated with full-parameter RL training. By introducing the concept of layer contribution, the authors quantify how much of the RL gains can be attributed to individual layers, finding that a small subset鈥攐ften just one layer鈥攁ccounts for the majority of improvements. Notably, the research identifies a consistent structural pattern where high-contribution layers are predominantly located in the middle of the transformer stack, suggesting a significant re-evaluation of RL training strategies in LLMs.
Training just one transformer layer can yield most of the RL performance gains, challenging the norm of updating all parameters uniformly.
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a central component of post-training large language models (LLMs), yet little is understood about how RL adaptation is distributed across transformer layers. Existing approaches typically update all model parameters uniformly, implicitly assuming that every layer contributes similarly to the gains obtained during RL post-training. In this work, we challenge this assumption through a systematic layer-wise study of RL training. Surprisingly, we find that training a single transformer layer can recover most of the gains achieved by full-parameter RL training, and in some cases even surpass it. To quantify this phenomenon, we introduce the quantity layer contribution, which measures the fraction of full RL improvement recovered by training a layer in isolation. Across seven models spanning two model families (Qwen3, Qwen2.5), three RL algorithms (GRPO, GiGPO, Dr. GRPO), and multiple task domains including mathematical reasoning, code generation, and agentic decision-making, we observe a remarkably stable pattern: RL gains are highly concentrated in a small subset of, and in many cases even a single, transformer layers. More strikingly, the same structural pattern consistently emerges: high-contribution layers concentrate in the middle of the transformer stack, while layers near the input and output ends contribute substantially less. The resulting layer rankings remain strongly correlated across datasets, tasks, model families, and RL algorithms.
