Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the transformation in software engineering practices due to generative AI, focusing on how engineers can maintain oversight and governance in an era of abundant code production. Through a detailed case study of a 12-week project, the authors analyze how a single expert engineer utilized AI coding agents to develop a document accessibility remediation system, generating a substantial empirical record of code and documentation. The resulting governance conversion model highlights how failures encountered during AI-mediated development can inform the creation of effective governance mechanisms, contrasting with traditional models that rely on pre-established obligations.
AI-generated code may be abundant, but maintaining effective governance in its development is crucial to prevent structural failures and ensure long-term maintainability.
Generative AI is shifting software engineering from a practice organized around scarce implementation effort toward one organized around abundant, low-cost code production. This shift changes the central engineering problem: not whether AI can generate useful code, but how engineers organize architectures, tools, evidence, and feedback loops so that AI-mediated development remains inspectable, correctable, and maintainable. We study this problem through a first-person case study: a 12-week development effort in which a single expert software engineer used frontier AI coding agents to build a document accessibility remediation system. The empirical record comprises 88 contemporaneous field notes, 420 KLOC of production code, and 1.16 MLOC of tests, lints, supporting documentation, and agent tooling. From this record, we develop a candidate middle-range theory of governance conversion, expressed as a process model explaining how high-velocity agentic implementation becomes governable. The model explains how agentic implementation velocity surfaces recurring structural failure classes, and how engineering judgment sustains velocity by converting those failures into durable governance mechanisms. In contrast to existing governance models that derive controls from known obligations, governance conversion explains how controls are discovered from failures that become visible only during agentic work. We use our model to make testable predictions and to describe implications for software engineering research and practice.
