Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a multitask transformation framework that addresses the limitations of existing multitask learning approaches by allowing for task-specific responses through unknown monotone transformations. By leveraging shared sparsity across tasks, the authors optimize a smoothed rank-based criterion with a group-Lasso penalty, implemented via a multitask deep neural network with a shared first layer. The method demonstrates competitive performance in prediction and variable selection, particularly in high-dimensional biological applications, and establishes theoretical guarantees for excess risk and variable selection consistency.
Task-specific responses can be unified through a novel multitask framework that reveals shared predictors across diverse outcome types, enhancing both prediction and interpretability.
Most existing multitask learning approaches are limited by their reliance on task-specific loss functions tailored to the scale and type of each outcome. When outcomes differ across tasks, these losses are generally not directly comparable, which makes it difficult to formulate a unified objective and may limit information sharing across tasks. We propose a multitask transformation framework in which task-specific responses may differ through unknown monotone transformations. Motivated by high-dimensional biological applications in which the predictor dimension may diverge with the sample size while only a common subset of predictors is informative, we consider shared sparsity across tasks. Under this framework, we estimate the target functions and identify important predictors by optimizing a smoothed rank-based criterion with a group-Lasso penalty, implemented through a multitask deep neural network with a shared first layer. We establish the nonasymptotic excess-risk bounds, and variable-selection consistency for the proposed estimator. Simulation studies show that the proposed method achieves competitive prediction and variable-selection performance compared with competing approaches. Analyses of gene-expression studies with continuous, binary, and mixed outcomes further illustrate that the proposed method improves prediction and identifies biologically meaningful shared predictors.
