Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study examines how ethos and pathos, two classical rhetorical appeals, influence the interpretations of social media messages by silent audiences who do not actively engage with the content. By analyzing a dataset of social media sentences and their human-written interpretations, the researchers found that 30% of interpretations diverged from the original sentences, particularly when the content was rhetorically charged. The findings reveal that the presence of ethos and pathos in original messages can significantly predict audience attitudes toward the author, highlighting the nuanced impact of rhetoric on perception beyond explicit engagement.
Silent readers interpret social media messages in ways that often diverge from the original intent, with ethos and pathos playing a crucial role in shaping their attitudes toward authors.
Rhetorical strategies and their influence on audiences are often studied through social media posts and comments. However, this focus overlooks the universal audience, which is the majority of readers who remain silent and do not explicitly express how a message affects them. This study investigates how two classical modes of persuasion, ethos and pathos, resonate in the silent audience's interpretations of meaning. Using a dataset of social media sentences paired with human-written interpretations, we label both sources for ethos and pathos and assess whether these rhetorical appeals are preserved. Our analyses show that interpretations diverge from the original sentences in 30% of cases, with rhetorically charged content eliciting greater variability than neutral content. We further find that ethos and pathos in original sentences can predict audience attitudes toward the author, underscoring the subtle ways rhetoric shapes perception beyond visible engagement.
