Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study compares top-down and bottom-up approaches for collecting text-based data on disasters, specifically analyzing German news articles about landslides. By evaluating how each method influences event coverage, the authors reveal significant differences in the representativeness of the resulting datasets. The findings underscore the importance of methodological choices in socio-environmental research, particularly regarding media coverage and disaster monitoring.
Bottom-up NLP clustering can yield a more nuanced understanding of disaster coverage than traditional top-down querying methods.
News articles are an important source of information on disaster impacts and adaptation. A key methodological challenge in socio-environmental studies is how to select a representative data sample. Two approaches are common: querying news databases top-down with the aid of an existing disaster inventory or using NLP methods to cluster news texts bottom-up based on temporal and spatial features. Using a dataset of German news about landslides worldwide, we compare these approaches and discuss variations in event coverage. Such research design decision can influence the resulting news sample, affecting its use in studies of inequality in media coverage, disaster monitoring and inventory enrichment.
