Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper conducts a comprehensive empirical study on the application of large language models (LLMs) for equivalent mutant detection (EMD) in software testing, utilizing a dataset of 3,302 Java and 1,088 C mutant pairs. The study benchmarks LLMs against traditional methods, revealing that LLM-based approaches achieve superior F1-scores and maintain efficiency with inference times comparable to existing machine-learning models. Notably, fine-tuned LLMs demonstrate significant cross-lingual generalization, establishing them as a promising solution for enhancing mutation testing practices.
LLMs outperform traditional methods in equivalent mutant detection, achieving higher accuracy while maintaining efficiency across multiple programming languages.
Mutation testing is a powerful technique for ensuring software quality. However, the presence of equivalent mutants introduces unnecessary costs and biases, limiting its practical effectiveness. Although numerous equivalent mutant detection (EMD) methods have been proposed, they often face distinct challenges: pure-code analysis methods can be limited by their reliance on specific compiler infrastructures, while existing machine-learning approaches remain constrained by scarce training data and limited generalization to unseen mutants. Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse code-related tasks by better capturing program semantics. Yet their potential for EMD remains largely unexplored, particularly in the multi-lingual context. This paper presents the first comprehensive empirical study on LLMs for EMD, using 3,302 Java and 1,088 C mutant pairs to benchmark against state-of-the-art methods, explore strategy variations, assess efficiency, and evaluate cross-lingual generalization. Experimental results show that LLM-based approaches achieve higher F1-scores than the evaluated traditional methods, with fine-tuned code embedding yielding the highest detection accuracy among the tested strategies. Moreover, LLM-based approaches strike a practical balance between effectiveness and efficiency with inference times comparable to existing machine-learning models. Importantly, fine-tuned LLMs demonstrate measurable generalization across programming languages. These findings establish LLMs as a viable and efficient approach for tackling the longstanding challenge of equivalent mutant detection, offering new directions for advancing mutation testing in practice.
