Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study analyzes over 73,000 GitHub repositories to uncover the survival dynamics of open-source projects, revealing that human capital is the most significant factor influencing project longevity. Surprisingly, while social attention is often viewed as beneficial, it can actually become a liability, particularly when combined with features that enhance accessibility, such as code readability and documentation. The findings underscore the importance of governance strategies that balance project visibility with contributor capacity to foster sustainable development in open-source communities.
Excessive social attention can paradoxically lead to project inactivity, especially when paired with enhanced onboarding features.
Social coding platforms such as GitHub host millions of repositories, yet many suffer from high mortality rates. Despite this, several survival factors remain poorly understood. Human capital is widely recognized as essential. Social attention, while often assumed to be a lifeline, can become a liability. Structural features that improve onboarding, such as code readability and documentation, may also accelerate the cessation of active development when combined with massive visibility. To examine these dynamics, we analyzed more than 73,000 GitHub repositories using an Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) survival framework, which accounts for the time-varying nature of predictors. Our study identifies human capital as the most critical determinant of project survival. In contrast, excessive social attention emerges as a liability, and when coupled with accessibility features, it amplifies the risk of project inactivity. Importantly, when the number of contributors interacts with social popularity, the protective effect of labor becomes visible, highlighting the need for governance strategies that balance visibility with labor capacity to ensure the long-term resilience of open-source projects.
