Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the prevailing narrative in human-robot interaction (HRI) and robotics conferences that portrays a future dominated by social robots as inevitable. It argues that this deterministic view encourages researchers to prioritize imaginative scenario design over the development of essential robotic capabilities, ultimately hindering progress in addressing real societal needs. By advocating for a shift towards understanding cognitive mechanisms in HRI without presuming a robotic future, the authors aim to redirect research efforts towards more meaningful advancements in the field.
Treating a future with social robots as inevitable stifles innovation and diverts attention from developing the necessary capabilities for meaningful human-robot interaction.
This paper takes issue with the recent themes of both the RO-MAN and the HRI conferences for their portrayal of a future human-robot society as inevitable. The focus is on discussing how such statements ultimately shape research. By treating a future human-robot society as a fait accompli, license is given for user studies to imagine any scenario they like, no matter whether it has any ecological relevance, and to emphasise the scenario design over actually creating robot abilities needed to fullfill the imagined role. Meanwhile, research that focusses on actual societal needs, without assuming that robots are a solution, is deprioritised, as is technical development, in particular with respect to abilities that are necessary to enable robots that function as social agents rather than a mere automation of tasks. A frame that simply assumes a robot future not only detracts from scientific advancement in favour of a techno-solutionism we ought to resist, it is also self-defeating as it risks stifling the research needed to bring it about. We should therefore reject attempts to frame and promote the field in terms of the inevitable social robot and instead focus on one that facilitates advances in the field regardless of what the future holds. This paper suggests that a renewed focus on cognitive mechanisms necessary for the "I" in HRI would be a good starting point.
