Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces an additive reference correction scheme for the transcorrelated (TC) method, specifically targeting its three-body mean-field approximation (xTC) to enhance energy difference calculations in small orbital basis sets. The authors identify that the primary source of error in double-味 bases arises from the reference contribution rather than the correlation energy, leading to the development of the reference-corrected xTC (RC-xTC). Benchmark results demonstrate that RC-xTC significantly outperforms standard xTC in terms of total and atomization energies, achieving better atomization energies than CCSD(T)-F12a while maintaining the total-energy accuracy of xTC.
RC-xTC not only surpasses standard xTC in energy accuracy but also outperforms CCSD(T)-F12a in the double-味 regime, reshaping expectations for small basis set calculations.
We introduce an additive reference correction for the transcorrelated (TC) method and its three-body mean-field approximation (xTC), to improve energy differences computed in small orbital basis sets. The correction is motivated by the observation that, for xTC atomization energies, the dominant error in double-味 bases originates from the reference contribution rather than from the correlation energy. In the proposed reference-corrected scheme (RC-xTC), the small-basis correlation energy is retained, while the corresponding TC reference energy is replaced by its value from a larger basis. Benchmark calculations for the non-relativistic HEAT set with the Dunning basis-set family show that RC-xTC substantially improves both total and atomization energies relative to standard xTC in double-味 bases. At the CCSD(T) level, RC-xTC yields better atomization energies than CCSD(T)-F12a in the double-味 regime, while preserving the favorable total-energy accuracy of xTC. At the CCSD level, RC-xTC improves atomization energies relative to F12a throughout the full basis-set sequence. As the basis set is enlarged, xTC and RC-xTC become progressively identical, as expected from the construction of the correction.
