Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a Time Series Classification (TSC) framework designed to predict individual-level absenteeism by leveraging historical attendance sequences to forecast future absences, addressing the limitations of traditional regression and classification methods that fail to account for temporal behavior. By constructing a simulated dataset and analyzing the effectiveness of Binary Focal Loss (BFL) and Geometric Mean (G-Mean) loss under severe class imbalance, the authors demonstrate that BFL can achieve a balanced accuracy of 0.888, while G-Mean offers automatic adaptation without parameter tuning. Among the evaluated deep learning architectures, the hybrid LSTM-Fully Convolutional Network (LSTM-FCN) outperforms others, achieving stable performance with balanced accuracy around 80% on test data.
Predicting absenteeism with a novel time-series framework reveals that traditional methods miss critical sequential patterns, leading to significant improvements in accuracy.
Staff absenteeism imposes substantial operational costs in high-demand work environments such as healthcare, emergency services, meat processing, construction, and courier and delivery services, where proactive workforce planning depends on reliable individual-level absence prediction. Existing regression and classification approaches share a structural limitation; they map features observed at time t to labels at the same time t, reproducing already-realised outcomes rather than predicting future events, and discard the sequential behavioural structure inherent in individual attendance histories. We propose a Time Series Classification (TSC) framework that separates historical attendance sequences from future absence labels, enabling genuinely proactive prediction. Due to the lack of public longitudinal attendance data, we construct a reproducible simulated dataset calibrated to the UCI dataset. We analyse Binary Focal Loss (BFL) and Geometric Mean (G-Mean) loss under severe class imbalance using only the imbalance ratio $蟻$. For BFL, the initial gradient ratio is $蟻伪/(1-伪)$, implying the balanced weight $伪= 1/(1+蟻) \approx 0.023$. Experiments show that performance is governed mainly by $伪$, with BFL achieving specificity 0.813 and balanced accuracy 0.888, comparable to G-Mean. Unlike BFL, G-Mean adapts automatically without parameter calibration. Among three deep learning architectures evaluated, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and the hybrid LSTM-Fully Convolutional Network (LSTM-FCN), the LSTM-FCN delivers strong precision and specificity. Stable performance is obtained with batch sizes >= 64 and window sizes between 40-80 days, yielding balanced accuracy of approximately 80% on held-out test data.
