Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces the Self-Improving Alignment with a regularized objective, SAIL-RevKL, which addresses the convergence issues of the original SAIL algorithm by incorporating a reverse Kullback-Leibler divergence penalty. This modification ensures that the optimization landscape is more favorable, allowing the algorithm to satisfy the Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition and achieve global convergence with near-linear sample complexity. Empirical evaluations show that SAIL-RevKL significantly outperforms the original SAIL on both MuJoCo benchmarks and LLM alignment tasks, highlighting its practical efficacy in addressing distribution shifts.
Regularizing the SAIL objective with reverse KL divergence not only resolves convergence issues but also enhances performance in LLM alignment tasks.
The Self-Improving Alignment (SAIL) algorithm addresses distribution shift by reducing a bilevel formulation of the problem to an efficient, single-level method. Empirically, SAIL has demonstrated strong performance on this task. However, a formal analysis of its convergence properties has been lacking. We identify a key theoretical challenge: the standard SAIL objective function is not guaranteed to be strongly concave due to unfavorable properties of its Hessian. To address this limitation, we propose a regularized objective, SAIL-RevKL, which incorporates a reverse Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence penalty to improve the optimization landscape. Our central theoretical contribution is to prove that this regularized objective satisfies the Polyak-Lojasiewicz (PL) condition within a bounded parameter space. We establish global convergence guarantees, achieving a near-linear sample complexity. We further validate the effectiveness and stability of SAIL-RevKL through empirical evaluations, demonstrating that it outperforms the vanilla SAIL on both MuJoCo benchmarks and LLM alignment tasks.
