Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces FinPersona-Bench, a benchmark designed to objectively measure Mandate Salience Decay (MSD) in autonomous financial agents, which diminishes the effectiveness of behavioral mandates over time. Through simulations that separate observable price from hidden fundamental value, the authors evaluate 18 LLMs across various behavioral profiles and market conditions, revealing that MSD is both model-dependent and exacerbated in volatile scenarios. Notably, while periodic mandate re-grounding improves performance for conservative agents, it can detrimentally affect aggressive agents, highlighting the need for tailored re-grounding strategies based on agent characteristics and market dynamics.
Mandate Salience Decay can lead to a 4.4x behavioral gap in financial agents over time, revealing critical vulnerabilities in their long-term deployment.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous financial agents initialized with explicit behavioral mandates such as "preserve capital" or "avoid speculative bets" that are meant to govern every decision throughout deployment. In practice, however, as market context accumulates over long horizons, these mandates gradually lose their behavioral influence, a phenomenon we formalize as Mandate Salience Decay (MSD). To measure MSD objectively, we introduce FinPersona-Bench, a simulation benchmark in which a synthetic market decouples observable price from hidden fundamental value, enabling falsifiable evaluation across three failure modes: trading without signal in calm markets, panic-selling during crashes, and ignoring fundamental value during speculative bubbles. Evaluating 18 leading frontier and open-source LLMs, each assigned one of three behavioral profiles ranging from strict capital preservation to aggressive growth, shows that MSD compounds over time and is model-dependent. In crash scenarios, the behavioral gap between static agents and those receiving periodic mandate re-grounding grows 4.4x from the first to the final quarter of the simulation. The effects of mandate re-grounding are not uniformly positive: it consistently helps conservative agents in low-signal markets but actively worsens behavior for aggressive agents in the same setting. These findings suggest that reliable long-horizon deployment requires selective, mandate-aware re-grounding based on agent profile and market regime.
