Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how the institutional composition of author teams influences the novelty of academic papers in natural language processing by classifying teams into academic, industrial, and mixed categories. By extracting fine-grained knowledge entities such as methods, datasets, tools, and metrics, the research measures novelty through entity combinations and analyzes their contributions. The findings reveal that mixed teams of academic and industrial authors produce more novel papers, particularly focusing on innovative method-metric combinations, compared to purely industrial collaborations that emphasize method-tool combinations.
Collaboration between academic and industrial institutions significantly boosts the novelty of NLP research outputs, challenging the effectiveness of isolated industrial efforts. WHY_IT MATTERS: This insight could reshape strategies for fostering impactful research collaborations between academia and industry, ultimately enhancing the quality and innovation of academic publications.
The composition of author teams is an important factor influencing the novelty of academic papers. However, existing studies have paid limited attention to the role of institutional composition, and most novelty measures remain at a general level, making it difficult to explain the specific sources and types of novelty in papers. Taking the field of natural language processing as an example, this study investigates the relationship between team institutional composition and the fine-grained novelty of academic papers. Author teams are classified into three types: academic institutions, industrial institutions, and mixed academic and industrial institutions. Four types of fine-grained knowledge entities are extracted from full-text papers, including methods, datasets, tools, and metrics. The novelty of papers is then measured based on entity combinations, and pairwise combinations of different entity types are further analyzed to examine their contributions to novel papers. The results show that, in the field of natural language processing, collaboration between industrial and academic institutions is more likely to produce novel papers than purely industrial collaboration. From the perspective of fine-grained knowledge entities, mixed academic and industrial teams pay more attention to the novelty of method-metric combinations, whereas industrial teams pay more attention to the novelty of method-tool combinations. This study reveals the relationship between institutional team composition and paper novelty through fine-grained novelty measurement, providing useful evidence for improving paper quality and promoting industry-academia-research collaboration.
