Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper argues for the integration of critical theories into information retrieval (IR) research to better define and achieve societal good, moving away from the prevailing liberal framework. By adopting a critical frame that prioritizes nondomination, the author contends that the IR community can clarify its understanding of societal impact and establish a robust theoretical foundation for evaluating progress in addressing societal challenges. The key result emphasizes that this shift could enhance the IR field's responsiveness to societal demands and ethical considerations.
Embracing critical theories in IR could redefine our understanding of societal good and reshape the field's ethical landscape.
Belkin and Robertson urged us, half a century ago, to develop a theoretical foundation for understanding what constitutes societal good that can inform information retrieval (IR) research and serve as a basis for determining when we should limit our scientific inquiry in the face of demands that are contradictory to societal good. In this article, I argue that to achieve this, IR should embrace critical theories and practices in our work, and shift away from the dominant liberal frame through which much of the IR community today view societal concerns in context of our research. Unlike the liberal frame, the critical frame explicitly adopts nondomination as its stated goal which can clarify our conceptualization of societal good within the field, provide necessary theoretical underpinning that Belkin and Robertson urged the community to develop, and serve as a basis for critical appraisals of our progress in enacting desired societal change.
