Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper extends Frictive Policy Optimization (FPO) to address perceptual asymmetry in dialogue, where participants possess asymmetric partial information, diverging from the original focus on propositional asymmetry. Through cross-corpora analysis and probing with large language models (LLMs) on referentially asymmetric dialogue tasks, the authors demonstrate that grounding failures are significantly influenced by the specific information horizon of each participant, revealing that misunderstandings often arise from ambiguous configurations. The findings indicate that having the correct perspective is more critical than omniscient access to all contextual information, leading to proposed refinements in annotation for better alignment classification.
Misunderstandings in dialogue arise not from a lack of information but from the critical importance of perspective in grounding references.
Frictive Policy Optimization (FPO; Pustejovsky et al., 2025) treats friction in collaborative dialogue -- misalignment, misunderstanding, repair -- as an epistemic signal essential to common-ground construction, rather than noise to be minimized. However, FPO and its implementations assume shared perceptual contexts, where friction arises from differently interpreted propositions over the same scene, which we define as propositional asymmetry. We extend FPO to perceptual asymmetry, where participants hold asymmetric partial information and the same referring expression yields different denotations depending on whose information state grounds the reference. We evaluate this through cross-corpora analysis and LLM probing on referentially asymmetric dialogue tasks, primarily the HCRC MapTask (Anderson et al., 1991). We find that FPO's friction functional is empirically valid only when evaluated from within each participant's information horizon: different landmark configurations produce qualitatively distinct grounding failure modes, with a small class of ambiguous configurations driving a disproportionate share of misunderstandings through trajectories that appear successful but silently diverge. The LLM probe confirms that having the "right perspective" matters more than having all perspectives: the informed single viewpoint outperforms omniscient access to both participants' contexts. We propose two annotation refinements: subtype decomposition of pending grounding states and accommodation-aware alignment classification.
