Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study addresses the critical challenge of evaluating Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) for automotive networks by introducing a standardized benchmarking framework that facilitates cross-dataset assessments. By integrating seven publicly available CAN IDS datasets collected under varying experimental conditions, the authors evaluate five distinct IDS approaches to reveal significant performance discrepancies across datasets. The findings underscore the necessity of cross-dataset evaluation to accurately gauge the robustness and generalization capabilities of CAN IDS methods, which is essential for ensuring vehicle security.
Detection performance of automotive IDS can vary dramatically across datasets, revealing the urgent need for standardized evaluation methods.
The increasing connectivity of modern vehicles has made securing in-vehicle communication networks a critical challenge. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) have been widely studied as a defense mechanism for detecting malicious activities on the Controller Area Network (CAN) bus. However, the evaluation of CAN IDS methods remains difficult due to inconsistencies in experimental setups and the lack of standardized benchmarking frameworks. As a result, reported performance often depends on dataset-specific characteristics and may not reflect how detection methods behave in different environments. This work introduces a benchmarking framework for consistent evaluation of CAN IDSs across multiple datasets. Using the proposed framework, we integrate seven publicly available CAN IDS datasets collected under different experimental conditions and perform cross-dataset evaluation of five conceptually different IDS approaches. Our results highlight how detection performance can vary significantly across datasets, demonstrating the importance of cross-dataset benchmarking for assessing the robustness and generalization capabilities of CAN IDS methods.
