Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces BayesEvolve, a framework that enhances autonomous scientific discovery by maintaining explicit, uncertainty-aware beliefs about hypothesis quality rather than relying solely on experimental memory. The authors demonstrate that BayesEvolve improves sample efficiency in black-box optimization tasks compared to traditional memory- and archive-guided approaches. Key results indicate that the belief state effectively predicts candidate performance and promotes focused exploration during late-stage experimentation.
Explicit belief states in BayesEvolve lead to significantly improved sample efficiency in scientific discovery, challenging the reliance on mere memory archives.
Autonomous scientific discovery systems increasingly use large language models (LLMs) to propose new hypotheses, but many such systems condition primarily on experimental memory: archives of high-scoring candidates or heuristic summaries of recent trials. We argue that discovery agents should instead maintain explicit, uncertainty-aware beliefs about hypothesis quality. We introduce BayesEvolve, a belief-guided discovery framework that converts experimental evidence into a predictive belief state and uses this belief to guide future experimentation. As a controlled testbed for belief-guided discovery, we evaluate BayesEvolve on shifted BBOB-style black-box optimization tasks, leaving program and laboratory discovery domains to future work. BayesEvolve improves sample efficiency over memory- and archive-guided LLM baselines under a fixed evaluation budget. We further show that the belief state is predictive on held-out candidate pools, that controlled decision-rule ablations favor belief-guided selection with an annealed uncertainty bonus, and that BayesEvolve exhibits productive late-stage concentration rather than unfocused exploration.
