Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces MuseBench, a novel benchmark designed to assess multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on their understanding of artistic intent across various audiovisual arts. By evaluating 28 state-of-the-art MLLMs with a comprehensive set of 4,016 questions derived from professional commentary and visual demonstrations, the study reveals that even the top-performing model only achieves 48.29% accuracy, highlighting a substantial gap compared to human expert performance at 87.18%. This work underscores the need for improved reasoning capabilities in MLLMs to grasp the nuanced creative choices that define artistic expression.
MLLMs struggle with artistic intent, scoring only 48.29% on a benchmark designed to evaluate nuanced understanding in audiovisual arts.
Audiovisual arts encompass diverse creative disciplines, including cinema, visual arts, stage performance, and game design, where artistic meaning arises from deliberate combinations of visual, auditory, and narrative elements (e.g., fear amplified through claustrophobic framing, or grief conveyed through silence and lingering close-ups). True artistic understanding extends beyond recognizing what is depicted to reasoning about why it is expressed through particular creative choices. Despite the strong progress of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), this critical aspect of artistic understanding remains underexplored, as existing benchmarks largely measure perceptual recognition while overlooking reasoning about creative intent. To address this gap, we introduce Musebench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs on nuanced artistic understanding. It comprises 4,016 questions spanning cinematic arts, static visual arts, stage performing arts, and game arts, distilled from over 10K candidate video essays that pair professional commentary with visual demonstration. To capture the open-ended nature of artistic analysis at scale, the benchmark combines single-select and variable-option multi-select questions. All questions are generated and refined through a four-phase iterative pipeline combining shortcut filtering, adversarial distractors, and expert validation. Comprehensive zero-shot evaluation of 28 state-of-the-art MLLMs reveals that even the best-performing model achieves only 48.29% accuracy, substantially below human expert performance of 87.18%, exposing a significant gap in current models'creative domain expertise.
AI2