Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study analyzes the novelty distribution of scholarly papers in library and information science (LIS) in China from 2000 to 2022, utilizing the BERTopic model to categorize topics based on abstracts and calculate novelty scores through a combination innovation theory of reference pairs. The findings reveal that archival research topics exhibit lower novelty compared to journal evaluation and patent technology, while overall novelty in the field has increased over time. Additionally, the research uncovers distinct author collaboration patterns, indicating that low-novelty topics often feature solo authorship, whereas high-novelty topics are characterized by greater inter-institutional collaboration.
Research papers in Chinese LIS are becoming more novel, with collaboration patterns revealing that solo authorship is linked to lower novelty.
Purpose This study aims to analyze the distribution of novelty among scholarly papers in the field of library and information science (LIS) in China. Specifically, this study explores the distribution of novelty of papers in various journals, research topics and different periods. It is possible to understand the characteristics of LIS research in China and what factors have influenced it. Design/methodology/approach This paper collects articles published in Chinese library science journals indexed by the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index from 2000 to 2022. The BERTopic model is used based on abstracts of the papers and to obtain the topic of each paper. Based on the combination innovation theory of reference pairs cited by focal papers, novelty scores of all papers are calculated. Next, this paper analyzes the novelty of papers under different topics. Finally, this paper analyzes the differences in author collaboration patterns across various topics, aiming to explain how these differences relate to the novelty of papers from a collaborative perspective. Findings This study shows that archival research topics have lower novelty than papers on journal evaluation and patent technology in Chinese LIS. Research papers in this field are gradually becoming more novel over time. Papers on different topics and with varying degrees of novelty exhibit distinct author collaboration patterns, with low-novelty topics more frequently featuring solo authorship, while high-novelty topics tend to involve a higher percentage of inter-institutional collaboration. Originality/value This study investigates the novelty characteristics of research papers on different topics in the field of LIS in China. The authors’ contribution includes visualizing research hotspots and trends in the field and analyzing authors’ collaboration patterns at the level of research topics, thereby providing new perspectives on the factors affecting the novelty of these papers.
