Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces the concept of geometric stability in neural population codes, defined as the Spearman rank correlation between split-half representational dissimilarity matrices, which is distinct from traditional measures of temporal stability and decoding accuracy. By analyzing 229 area-session observations across 68 brain regions during a visual discrimination task, the authors find that geometric stability significantly predicts trial-by-trial neural-behavioral coupling, while centroid drift does not. The research highlights a regional hierarchy of stability, with the striatum exhibiting the highest geometric stability, and proposes a circuit-level model to explain these findings through recurrent excitatory coupling that enhances representational consistency.
Geometric stability, a previously overlooked property of neural population codes, reveals critical insights into neural-behavioral coupling that traditional stability measures fail to capture.
Current models of representational reliability in neural populations focus on temporal stability: whether population centroids are preserved across sessions and days. This framing leaves a fundamental question unanswered: how reliably does the pairwise distance structure among stimuli reproduce across independent observations within a session? We argue that this property, geometric stability, constitutes an independent axis of representational analysis that existing frameworks do not capture. We formalize geometric stability as the Spearman rank correlation between split-half representational dissimilarity matrices (Shesha) and show that it is empirically dissociable from both temporal stability and decoding accuracy. Across 229 area-session observations spanning 68 brain regions in a visual discrimination task (Steinmetz et al. 2019), geometric stability predicts trial-by-trial neural-behavioral coupling (蟻= 0.18, p = 0.005) while centroid drift does not (蟻= 0.002, p = 0.976). The regional hierarchy, with striatum most stable (S = 0.44) and hippocampus least (S = 0.19), runs roughly opposite to the temporal stability hierarchy. Directionally consistent olfactory data (Bolding \& Franks 2018) motivate an attractor network model in which recurrent excitatory coupling amplifies split-half RDM consistency by completing stimulus patterns from sparse feedforward input (蟻= +0.64, p = 0.010), providing a circuit-level account of how geometric stability emerges. These results establish geometric stability as a functionally relevant, circuit-dependent property of neural population codes, orthogonal to temporal drift measures and complementary to recent accounts of how recurrent connectivity balances representational stability with sequential dynamics in hippocampal circuits.
