Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study explores how LLM-driven robots decide to intervene in multi-party conversations, focusing on the explanations generated for their interventions. By analyzing 610 intervention explanations from interactions involving three human participants and two robots, the researchers identified five key themes emphasizing facilitation and interaction flow. The findings reveal that while intervention patterns are consistent, the roles of the robots鈥攎over and opposer鈥攕ignificantly influence the nature of their interventions, contributing to the understanding of explainable AI in social robotics.
LLM-driven robots provide facilitation-oriented explanations for their interventions, revealing nuanced roles that shape group interactions.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in social robots to support natural group interactions, yet their role in complex multi-party settings remains underexplored. In particular, it is unclear how LLM-driven robots decide when and why to intervene in group conversations. This paper investigates the intervention explanations generated by an LLM-based orchestrator in a multi-party interaction involving three human participants and two robots. We conducted a between-subjects study with 24 groups (66 university students), comparing a homogeneous condition (two robots with the same role, i.e., a mover) and a heterogeneous condition (two robots with different roles, i.e., a mover and an opposer). At each conversational turn, the LLM orchestrator decided whether to intervene and generated a textual explanation of its decision. We performed a thematic analysis of 610 intervention explanations, identifying five recurring themes. Results show that explanations are facilitation-oriented, emphasizing agreement, participation, and interaction flow. While patterns remain stable across conditions, role differentiation emerges: the mover supports coordination, whereas the opposer drives goal-oriented interventions. These findings contribute to explainable AI by characterizing how LLM-driven systems justify intervention decisions in real-time, multi-party human-robot interaction.
