Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces TUA-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate general-purpose terminal-use agents (TUAs) across a variety of real-world tasks, including document editing and email management. Unlike existing benchmarks that focus on graphical user interfaces or technical programming tasks, TUA-Bench encompasses 120 tasks co-developed with domain experts, providing a more realistic assessment of agent capabilities in terminal environments. The results reveal that the leading agent, Claude Code with Claude Opus 4.8, achieves only 65.8% performance, highlighting significant gaps in current terminal-use agent capabilities and underscoring the need for improved general-purpose AI systems.
Terminal-use agents are still far from achieving reliable general-purpose performance, with top models only scoring 65.8% on a new benchmark that spans diverse real-world tasks.
As large language models and harness frameworks continue to advance, agents operating in terminals are increasingly capable of performing a broader range of general computer-use tasks beyond coding. However, existing benchmarks do not adequately evaluate general-purpose terminal computer-use agents (TUAs): general computer-use benchmarks primarily target graphical user interfaces (GUIs), whereas terminal-based benchmarks largely emphasize technical and programming-centric workflows historically native to the shell. We introduce TUA-Bench, a general-purpose benchmark for terminal-use agents. TUA-Bench includes 120 real-world tasks across five task families, covering routine digital activities-including document editing, email management, and live-web information seeking-as well as scientific and engineering workflows co-designed with PhD-level domain experts that require specialized software. This breadth distinguishes TUA-Bench from prior shell-focused or domain-specific benchmarks. Each task is manually designed, runs in a real terminal with a deterministic setup script, and is evaluated by an execution-based scoring protocol. We find that the strongest frontier agent, Claude Code with Claude Opus 4.8 max reasoning effort, achieves 65.8% overall performance, with substantial gaps across both tracks. By providing a broad and realistic evaluation of terminal-use capabilities, TUA-Bench aims to accelerate the transition from narrow, task-specific assistants to general-purpose agents capable of operating reliably across diverse digital environments.
Stanford HAI