Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates simulation-based inference (SBI) as a scalable alternative to Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for Bayesian calibration of a mechanistic SECIR epidemiological model, specifically using COVID-19 ICU occupancy data from Germany. The authors found that SBI not only matched the posterior distributions produced by MCMC across various epidemic phases but also significantly reduced computational time, achieving comparable results in under 70 seconds compared to MCMC's 1000 seconds for shorter inference windows. For a more complex 201-day reconstruction, SBI maintained posterior structure while drastically cutting runtime from over 19,000 seconds for MCMC to just 157 seconds.
Simulation-based inference can achieve rapid and accurate Bayesian calibration of epidemiological models, outperforming traditional MCMC methods in both speed and efficiency.
Mechanistic epidemiological models are widely used to support infectious disease forecasting and public-health decision making. Bayesian calibration of such models is commonly performed using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), which can become computationally expensive for high-dimensional nonlinear systems and repeated near-real-time analyses. Here, we investigate simulation-based inference (SBI) using neural posterior estimation as a scalable alternative for Bayesian calibration of a mechanistic SECIR epidemiological model using COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) occupancy data from Germany during 2020. We compared SBI and MCMC across multiple epidemic phases using both 31-day inference windows and a substantially more challenging 201-day reconstruction problem involving multiple transmission change points. Posterior agreement was evaluated quantitatively using Wasserstein distances and Kullback-Leibler divergences together with posterior predictive checks. Across the 31-day windows, SBI recovered posterior distributions in strong agreement with MCMC while accurately reproducing observed ICU trajectories. In the 201-day setting, SBI preserved the dominant posterior structure despite increased uncertainty. SBI, by combining CPU and GPU resources, substantially reduced computational runtime compared with MCMC, which was restricted to running on CPUs. Whereas MCMC required approximately 1000 seconds for the 31-day inference problems, SBI achieved comparable posterior and predictive performance in approximately 60-70 seconds on a single GPU. For the 201-day inference problem, SBI required an average of 157 seconds, while the MCMC runs took over 19,000 seconds. Our results demonstrate that SBI provides a rapid and computationally efficient framework for Bayesian calibration of mechanistic epidemiological models, supporting repeated near-real-time inference and rapid outbreak analysis.
