Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces the Syntactic Belief Update framework, which models how humans process garden path sentences by predicting and updating a probability distribution over syntactic trees as new words are encountered. The research reveals that traditional lexical surprisal fails to account for the processing difficulties associated with these sentences, while the proposed framework effectively captures the magnitude of belief updates required when a listener is misled. Key findings indicate that this approach aligns more closely with human reading time data, suggesting a significant shift in understanding sentence processing mechanisms in psycholinguistics.
Traditional measures of sentence processing fail to account for garden path difficulties, but a new framework reveals that syntactic belief updates are key to understanding these challenges.
Garden path sentences present a processing difficulty for humans -- the sentence prefix leads the listener towards one interpretation, until the listener hears a critical word that shows that the initial interpretation was wrong. Lexical surprisal, a measure that usually predicts sentence processing difficulty quite well, fails to provide good predictions for garden path sentences. We propose an alternative that actively predicts a probability distribution over syntactic trees (its syntactic belief) and updates that distribution after each new word. If a processor is led down a garden path, syntactic beliefs will be wrong and will require a large update at the critical word. The magnitude of the update is measured with a generalized R茅nyi divergence. Crucially, this metric is dependent on lexical items, but is fully independent of the probability of lexical items. This Syntactic Belief Update provides a better fit to the human reading time data on garden path sentences. This suggests a new research direction examining purely non-lexical alternatives to surprisal for psycholinguistics.
