Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Robust-TO, a novel video understanding framework that addresses the Blind Trust Problem by integrating per-frame trustworthiness into video reasoning processes. By organizing various visual perception tools under a unified evidence interface and employing a calibrated reliability score, Robust-TO enhances reasoning accuracy and efficiency, particularly in the presence of visual perturbations. The framework achieves a 10.6% accuracy improvement over the strongest open-source baseline on clean inputs and demonstrates superior resilience to corruption, maintaining a 5.8% accuracy advantage under realistic conditions.
Robust-TO not only boosts video reasoning accuracy by over 10% but also minimizes performance drops under real-world visual distortions.
Video reasoning language models implicitly assume that every input frame is equally reliable. This leads to what we term the Blind Trust Problem: under realistic perturbations such as motion blur, glare, or occlusion, frontier video reasoning models can suffer 15-30%p accuracy drops on real-world embodied benchmarks, while remaining unaware that their visual evidence has been degraded. To address this challenge, we propose Robust-TO, an agentic video understanding framework that explicitly integrates per-frame trustworthiness into every stage of reasoning. Robust-TO organizes heterogeneous visual perception tools under a unified evidence interface. Each tool receives a sub-query derived from the original question and a set of trustworthy frames selected by the reliability-relevance score. It returns evidence in a shared format: a concrete prediction (e.g., a bounding box, motion trajectory, recognized text, or action label), temporal grounding, and a calibrated reliability score. During reasoning, these calibrated scores guide evidence weighting in a three-tier synthesis process (high/medium/low) and define a confidence-cost GRPO reward that jointly optimizes correctness, evidence reliability, and efficiency. On two video reasoning benchmarks spanning eight tasks, Robust-TO achieves 56.4% average accuracy on clean inputs, surpassing the strongest open-source baseline by 10.6%p and outperforming Gemini-2.5-Pro (46.2%). Under five realistic corruption types, Robust-TO maintains 54.3% average accuracy, 5.8%p above the strongest open-source baseline, while exhibiting the smallest clean-to-corrupted accuracy drop among all compared methods.
