Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces an energy-constrained hypercube spatial queueing model tailored for electric service vehicles (ESVs), integrating battery-state dynamics to enhance operational efficiency in on-demand service systems. By formulating a joint location-zoning problem, the authors develop a Branch-Price-and-Evaluation framework that optimizes station placement and service zone design, revealing that effective zoning strategies can significantly improve profitability. Key results indicate that under varying demand conditions, optimal zoning can outweigh the benefits of battery capacity improvements, challenging conventional assumptions about energy management in service operations.
Effective service zone design can outperform battery upgrades in profitability, especially under varying demand conditions.
Electric service vehicles (ESVs), such as mobile chargers and drone-based service units, are becoming an important operational resource for on-demand service systems. Unlike conventional spatial servers, ESV operations are shaped by battery limits and recharging needs, which affect dispatch feasibility and spatial deployment decisions. We develop an energy-constrained hypercube spatial queueing model that embeds battery-state dynamics into the classical hypercube framework and uses a semi-Markov representation to estimate steady-state performance. We then formulate a joint location--zoning problem for station placement and service zone design. The resulting large-scale mixed-integer nonlinear program admits a set partitioning reformulation whose column coefficients are not available in closed form. We therefore develop a Branch-Price-and-Evaluation framework for set partitioning problems with externally computable column coefficients: upper-bounding surrogates guide pricing, and iterative exact evaluation updates the coefficients of active columns. Computational results show that explicit energy modeling significantly reduces false service promises and yields more credible planning decisions. They also reveal a load-dependent reversal in zoning: pooling is preferable under light demand, whereas tighter zoning becomes more profitable as demand increases. Over the tested range, profitability is driven more by zoning than by battery improvement, suggesting that managers should get service zone design right before investing in battery upgrades; this caution is reinforced by the counterintuitive finding that larger batteries may delay replenishment and reduce fleet readiness under sparse demand. These findings show that energy feasibility is not merely a matter of battery-capacity expansion, but a design dimension that shapes service-zone configuration.