Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces a novel 3D-printable dataset of mathematically defined textures aimed at enhancing fair testing and comparisons of tactile sensors. By fabricating six parametrically generated surface patterns across different 3D printers and filament types, the research evaluates the impact of print quality on tactile sensor performance, revealing that higher-end printers yield more consistent tactile signatures. The findings underscore the challenges of cross-printer generalization due to geometric inconsistencies, establishing a foundational benchmark for reproducible tactile sensor research.
High-end 3D printers can significantly improve the consistency of tactile sensor readings, but cross-printer generalization remains a hurdle.
Existing texture datasets for tactile sensing primarily consist of sensor readings from a specific sensor interacting with available surfaces/objects rather than describing the textures themselves, limiting fair comparison between tactile sensors and hindering reproducible research. In this work, we introduce a 3D-printable dataset of mathematically defined textures designed to be fabricated reliably across different printers and filament types. The dataset consists of six parametrically generated surface patterns derived from combinations of sine-wave and Fourier-based functions, giving controlled variation in spatial frequency, amplitude, and directional structure. We evaluate the reproducibility of these textures across three popular 3D printers and multiple filament types by measuring variance in images captured using an optical TacTip sensor under controlled contact conditions. Our results show that print quality, particularly peak sharpness and stringing, affects tactile variance, with higher-end printers producing significantly more consistent signatures. Classification experiments using neural networks and PCA-based models further demonstrate that high-quality prints support strong within-printer generalisation, while cross-printer generalisation remains challenging due to geometric inconsistencies. This work establishes the first openly available, physically reproducible 3D-printed texture benchmark, providing a foundation for fair comparison of tactile sensors.
