Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This survey comprehensively reviews the current landscape of toxicity detection and mitigation strategies for multilingual language models, highlighting the uneven safety performance across different languages and cultural contexts. It categorizes various threat models and task formulations while examining multilingual detection techniques and mitigation strategies, revealing persistent challenges such as uneven language coverage and culturally contingent definitions of harm. The findings underscore the complexities of ensuring safety in multilingual LLMs, particularly the risk of suppressing legitimate expressions while attempting to detoxify outputs.
Multilingual LLMs face unique toxicity challenges that could undermine safety efforts if not addressed, risking the suppression of legitimate cultural expressions.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across languages, but their safety behavior remains uneven across linguistic and cultural contexts. This survey synthesizes work on toxicity detection and detoxification for multilingual LLMs. We first catalogue threat models that exploit language choice, translation pivots, code-switching, orthographic variation, multi-turn interaction, and post-deployment fine-tuning to weaken safety alignment. We then organize task formulations (toxic-to-neutral rewriting, toxicity classification, and toxic-generation evaluation), multilingual detection approaches (cross-lingual encoders, translation pipelines, representation-level probes, and LLM-based detectors), and mitigation strategies spanning data filtering, supervised and preference-based tuning, decoding-time steering, representation editing, and multilingual guardrails. Across these areas, we identify persistent challenges: uneven language coverage, culturally contingent definitions of harm, fragmented evaluation protocols, and the risk that detoxification suppresses legitimate dialectal or identity-related expression.
