Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the prevailing reliance on ImageNet for evaluating diffusion transformers (DiTs) in image generation, revealing that improvements in class-conditional generation metrics do not necessarily translate to text-to-image (T2I) performance. By introducing NanoGen, a unified training and evaluation framework, the authors demonstrate that training T2I models can be achieved with comparable computational resources to ImageNet, while also highlighting a significant lack of correlation between performance metrics on the two tasks. The establishment of DiffusionBench as a holistic benchmark underscores the need for a dual evaluation approach, suggesting that methods validated on this benchmark are more indicative of genuine advancements in generative modeling.
Method improvements in diffusion transformers may not be reflected in both ImageNet and text-to-image tasks, revealing a critical gap in current evaluation practices.
Diffusion transformer (DiT) research on image generation has converged to a single evaluation setup: class-conditional generation on ImageNet. While methods improve the FID and related metrics, it is increasingly unclear whether they reflect real progress in generative modeling. The natural alternative, i.e., text-to-image (T2I) generation, is perceived as too costly or inconvenient to train and evaluate and is often skipped. We argue that this perception no longer holds. We introduce NanoGen, a unified DiT training and evaluation framework. NanoGen matches state-of-the-art DiT baselines on ImageNet and, with 12 lines of configuration change, also trains competitive text-to-image models. It currently supports RAE, VAE, pixel-space, and MeanFlow diffusion methods under both ImageNet and T2I setups. Under NanoGen, training T2I requires comparable compute to ImageNet. After training 21 latent diffusion models with NanoGen, we observe that method ranking shows no strong correlation between ImageNet and T2I generation: Pearson correlation is between -0.377 and -0.580 across three metrics. This suggests that a method which improves class-conditional ImageNet FID may show no corresponding improvement on T2I, clearly indicating the necessity of evaluating DiTs on both tasks. To this end, we summarize ImageNet and text-to-image results, which yields DiffusionBench, a holistic benchmark for DiT research. We recommend reporting DiffusionBench in place of ImageNet alone: methods that improve DiffusionBench are more likely to reflect broader progress.
