Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
MIT CSAILKennesaw State UniversityMichigan Technological UniversityOregon Health & Science UniversitySmartbox Assistive Technology LtdJun 23, 2026arXiv:2606.24854This paper investigates the complexities of designing and evaluating AI-powered augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interfaces, emphasizing the intersectional needs of users. By analyzing six distinct AAC problem spaces, the authors highlight how traditional evaluation metrics fall short in capturing the nuanced desires of diverse users. The proposed robust evaluation methods aim to better address these complexities, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness of AI in AAC applications.
Current evaluation metrics for AI-powered AAC systems overlook the intersectional nuances of user needs, risking ineffective communication solutions.
Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance what people who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) are able to do with their systems. However, evaluating AI-powered AAC interfaces can be difficult. People are intersectional beings and current evaluation metrics can struggle to capture the multifaceted and nuanced desires people may have for their AAC. We explore the complicated nature of six AAC problem spaces, explore how AI might be used in these spaces, and suggest more robust methods of evaluation that take the intersectional nuances of people into account. We also discuss broader issues that arise across these problem spaces and how they could be addressed using our proposed evaluation methods.
