Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces CALIBER, a novel framework for calibrating confidence in reasoning language models by distinguishing between pre- and post-reasoning confidence estimates. By aligning supervision targets with the model's information state, CALIBER significantly reduces Expected Calibration Error (ECE) by 52.5% compared to existing methods on the BigMathDigits dataset for a 7B model, while also achieving competitive performance on larger models and various out-of-distribution benchmarks. The results highlight the importance of state-dependent confidence estimation, particularly under distribution shifts, enhancing the reliability of language models in complex reasoning tasks.
Confidence calibration in reasoning models can be dramatically improved by aligning supervision with the model's state, cutting ECE by over half on challenging benchmarks.
Reasoning language models are increasingly asked not only to answer difficult questions, but also to estimate their likelihood of success. Existing methods typically elicit confidence only once: either before thinking or after answering. We argue that confidence in reasoning models is state-dependent: before thinking, confidence should estimate the chance of the model correctly solving the prompt, while after thinking it should predict whether the realized answer is likely to be correct. This distinction determines the appropriate supervision target: prompt-level success should supervise confidence estimates made after seeing the prompt, while individual answer-level correctness should supervise confidence estimates made after answering. We introduce CALIBER (Calibration Before and After Reasoning), which elicits both estimates and supervises each with the target matched to its information state. Under this unified protocol, CALIBER reduces Expected Calibration Error (ECE) by 52.5% over the strongest single-confidence baseline on BigMathDigits for the 7B model, while achieving the best Brier score and AUROC, and remains within 2.1 points of the best accuracy. Further, on a larger 30B model, CALIBER achieves the best ECE on BigMathDigits while remaining competitive in Brier score and AUROC. Out of distribution, it achieves the best ECE and Brier score on GPQA and TriviaQA, and remains competitive on SimpleQA. Ablations further show that this position-target alignment is most beneficial under distribution shift where it consistently reduces calibration error across all out-of-distribution benchmarks.
