Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces AutoSpec, a framework that enhances the safety of large language model (LLM) agents by evolving expert-designed safety rules through counterexample-guided inductive synthesis (CEGIS) and inductive logic programming (ILP). By iteratively refining rules based on user annotations, AutoSpec achieves a remarkable F1 score of 0.98 and 0.93 across two domains, significantly reducing false positives by up to 94% while maintaining high recall. The approach not only improves safety but also ensures that the resulting rules remain interpretable and generalizable to new scenarios, addressing a critical gap in existing safety methodologies for autonomous agents.
AutoSpec achieves up to 4.8x higher F1 scores than traditional methods, transforming safety rule evolution into a precise, interpretable process for LLM agents.
Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate complex tasks by integrating language models with external tools and environments. However, their autonomy poses significant safety risks: agents may execute destructive commands, leak sensitive data, or violate domain constraints. Existing safety approaches face a fundamental tradeoff: hand-crafted rules are interpretable but brittle, with overly conservative rules blocking safe operations (high false positives) while permissive rules miss unsafe behaviors (high false negatives). Neural classifiers lack the interpretability required for safety-critical deployments. We present AutoSpec, a framework that automatically evolves deployed expert-designed safety rules from user safe/unsafe annotations through counterexample-guided inductive synthesis (CEGIS) guided by inductive logic programming (ILP). Starting from the expert rules and a stream of annotated traces, AutoSpec iteratively evaluates rules, mines false-positive and false-negative counterexamples, uses ILP to learn which predicates discriminate them, generates candidate rule edits, and verifies candidates to select the best revision. The key insight is that ILP efficiently identifies predicates that appear frequently in false negatives but rarely in false positives (or vice versa), dramatically pruning the exponential search space of rule edits. This continues until convergence, producing interpretable rules that balance precision and recall. We evaluate AutoSpec on 291 execution traces spanning code execution and embodied agent domains. AutoSpec raises rule F1 to 0.98 and 0.93 across the two domains, achieving up to 94% false positive reduction while maintaining high recall, and converges within 4-5 iterations. The ILP-guided approach achieves up to 4.8x higher F1 than heuristic CEGIS. The learned rules are human-readable, auditable, and generalize to unseen scenarios.
