Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces FlowR2A, a novel approach to multimodal driving planning that reconciles the limitations of scoring-based and anchor-based methods by transforming simulation-based rewards into generative conditions. By utilizing a flow-matching decoder to learn reward-conditioned action distributions from dense trajectory-reward pairs, FlowR2A effectively combines the benefits of dense supervision with dynamic proposal generation. The method achieves state-of-the-art performance on NAVSIM benchmarks, demonstrating significant improvements in the quality of multimodal proposals while adhering to safety and compliance constraints.
FlowR2A unifies dense reward supervision and dynamic proposal generation, achieving state-of-the-art multimodal driving planning performance.
Multimodal driving planning faces a long-standing tension between two paradigms: scoring-based methods benefit from dense reward supervision but are confined to a fixed action vocabulary, while anchor-based methods generate proposals dynamically yet suffer from sparse supervision constrained to a single ground-truth trajectory. In this work, we propose FlowR2A, which resolves this tension by reframing simulation-based rewards from discriminative targets into generative conditions. By learning the reward-conditioned action distribution from dense trajectory-reward pairs with a flow-matching decoder, FlowR2A unifies the dense supervision of scoring-based methods with the proposal generation of anchor-based methods in a single generative model, forcing the model to internalize the correlation between an action and its outcomes in safety, progress, comfort, and rule compliance. To balance hard safety constraints against soft progress objectives, we introduce fine-grained per-timestep reward conditioning and reward noise augmentation. The generative formulation naturally supports controllable test-time sampling via reward guidance and anchored sampling, producing high-quality proposals. FlowR2A achieves state-of-the-art results on the NAVSIM v1 and v2 benchmarks, with multimodal proposals of substantially higher quality than prior methods.
