Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study conducts a cost-benefit analysis of evolving task-specialist versus generalist behaviors in multi-robot systems (MRSs) within a foraging scenario using a physics-based robotics simulator. The findings reveal that as the size of the MRS increases, the total evaluation budget required to evolve task-specialist behaviors that outperform generalist behaviors decreases. This insight underscores the efficiency gains from specialization in larger robotic teams, highlighting a critical trade-off in resource allocation for evolutionary optimization.
Task-specialist robots can outperform generalists with less evaluation budget as team size grows, challenging assumptions about optimization efficiency.
Task specialization can improve the efficiency of multi-robot systems (MRSs). Previous works have investigated the emergence of task-specialist robot controllers through evolutionary optimization and have argued that task specialization is more likely to evolve when subtask behaviors are readily available as building blocks. However, the available evaluation budget must be distributed across all subtasks, whereas a single generalist behavior can exploit the entire budget for its own optimization. We present a cost-benefit analysis of evolving task-specialist versus generalist behaviors in a foraging scenario here. In a physics-based robotics simulator, we study the total evaluation budget required to evolve task-specialist behaviors that outperform generalist behaviors across MRS sizes. We show that with increasing MRS size, a lower total evaluation budget is sufficient to evolve specialists that outperform generalists.
