Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces BehaviorBench, a comprehensive benchmarking framework designed to evaluate foundation models across four key behavioral science capabilities: behavior prediction and simulation, strategic decision-making, subject-trait inference, and behavioral knowledge application. The study reveals that while general-purpose models perform well on individual-level tasks, fine-tuned behavioral foundation models like Be.FM-1.5 significantly outperform them in terms of distributional alignment, which is crucial for behavioral validity. By emphasizing the importance of distributional evaluation, the authors establish BehaviorBench as a vital tool for developing AI systems that are better aligned with behavioral science needs.
Fine-tuned behavioral models can achieve superior population-level alignment, closing the gap with general-purpose models in individual predictions.
Foundation models have been increasingly applied to behavioral science domains such as psychology, sociology, and economics. While these models show promise in individual tasks such as survey response prediction and human-subject experiment simulation, there remains no systematic understanding of how well they perform across diverse behavioral science tasks, contexts, and populations. We introduce BehaviorBench, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates foundation models along four core capabilities: (1) behavior prediction and simulation, (2) strategic decision-making, (3) subject-trait inference, and (4) behavioral knowledge application. Crucially, BehaviorBench evaluates model outputs at both the individual and distributional levels, capturing not only per-subject accuracy but also population-level alignment, an essential requirement for behavioral validity. Leveraging the tasks in BehaviorBench, we further develop Be.FM-1.5, extending the Be.FM family of behavioral foundation models fine-tuned on behavioral data. Our results reveal a considerable gap: proprietary general-purpose models excel at individual-level prediction and knowledge-intensive tasks, whereas behavioral foundation models, fine-tuned on behavioral data, achieve substantially stronger distributional alignment. Notably, Be.FM-1.5 leads on distributional metrics and remains competitive on individual-level metrics, suggesting that proper behavioral adaptation can close the gap. Our results highlight the importance of distributional evaluation, establish BehaviorBench as a foundation for developing and assessing behaviorally aligned AI systems, and demonstrate Be.FM-1.5's potential for a broad range of behavioral science studies. Our BehaviorBench and Be.FM-1.5 models can be accessed via https://umich-foreseer.github.io/behaviorbench/.
Stanford HAI