Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study constructs large-scale co-occurrence networks of algorithms in natural language processing (NLP) by analyzing the full text of academic papers, providing a novel perspective on algorithm influence through their interconnections. By employing deep learning models to extract algorithm entities and applying various centrality measures, the research reveals that algorithm networks exhibit complex network characteristics, with classic and intersectional algorithms demonstrating significant influence over time. Notably, the findings indicate that as an algorithm's influence wanes, it first loses its central position within the network, highlighting the dynamic nature of academic influence in AI research.
Classic algorithms maintain their dominance in influence, but their decline reveals a predictable loss of network centrality that could inform future research trajectories.
Algorithms have become central to scientific research in the era of artificial intelligence (AI). Although algorithm mentions in papers are often used to indicate popularity and influence, existing studies usually evaluate individual algorithms in isolation and pay limited attention to the collective influence formed through their interconnections. This study constructs large-scale algorithm co-occurrence networks in natural language processing (NLP) based on the full text of academic papers and investigates algorithm influence from a network perspective. Using deep learning models, we extract algorithm entities and build overall, cumulative, and annual co-occurrence networks. We analyze their structural characteristics and apply multiple centrality measures to assess the group influence of algorithms across the whole field and over time. The results show that algorithm networks display typical features of complex networks, with increasingly dense connections developing over approximately two decades. Classic, high-performing algorithms and those located at the intersections of different research periods tend to have high popularity, control, centrality, and balanced influence. When the influence of an algorithm declines, it usually loses its core network position first, followed by weaker associations with other algorithms. This study is the first large-scale analysis of algorithm co-occurrence networks. Covering more than four decades of academic publications, it provides a temporal and structural view of algorithm influence and offers a foundation for future research on networks linking algorithms, scholars, and tasks.
