Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces cryptographic certificates of validity designed to ensure the trustworthiness of agentic AI systems by formally specifying correctness conditions as logical predicates. By compiling these predicates into a witness-checking problem over polynomial constraints, the authors leverage succinct cryptographic proof systems to provide verifiable assurances without requiring trust in the agent itself. The key result is that this approach enables agents to produce independently checkable proofs of compliance with formal policies, bridging the gap between formal verification and cryptographic authentication.
Trustworthy AI can now be certified with cryptographic proofs that don't require trusting the agent or re-executing its computations.
We propose cryptographic certificates of validity for agentic AI systems. The core idea is to formally specify a correctness or policy condition as a logical predicate, compile this predicate to a witness-checking problem over polynomial constraints, and use a succinct cryptographic proof system (and optionally zero-knowledge) to certify that the condition holds. This offers a middle ground between formal verification of source code, and cryptographic authentication. An agent's action can be accompanied by an independently checkable proof that it satisfies an agreed formal policy, without requiring the verifier to trust the agent or to re-execute computation. We outline the approach at a high level, give the core mathematical translation, relate the proposal to proof-carrying code, zkVMs, formal methods, and agent governance, and note the specification, auditing, and deployment questions that a full implementation must answer.
