Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper extends a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) framework to manage decentralized traffic flows in Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) corridors, addressing the limitations of centralized traffic management as autonomous aircraft proliferate. The authors demonstrate that policies trained in single-corridor environments can effectively transfer to complex multi-corridor networks, achieving efficient traffic management without the need for centralized coordination or model retraining. Key results indicate that the decentralized approach maintains high performance in terms of corridor adherence, completion rates, and inter-aircraft separation across varying traffic densities and network geometries.
Decentralized traffic management for autonomous aircraft can achieve high performance without centralized coordination, adapting seamlessly to complex environments.
As autonomous aircraft are introduced at scale and traffic density increases, centralized management becomes insufficient to coordinate the large numbers of crewed and uncrewed aircraft. Dedicated Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) corridors have therefore been proposed for organizing high-density autonomous traffic flows. The desire to scalably provide autonomous aircraft flexibility in trajectory planning motivates the development of decentralized approaches to traffic management in AAM corridors. In this work, we extend a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) approach to address the challenge of decentralized traffic flow management in air corridor networks. We test policies trained in a single-corridor setting on increasingly complex multi-corridor networks with combinations of merges and splits in a zero-shot manner. Experimental results demonstrate that learned behaviors transfer well to scenarios with varying traffic density, network geometry, and heterogeneous vehicle performance, without needing centralized coordination or model retraining. We evaluate system-level performance in terms of conformance to corridor boundaries, completion rates, average speeds, distance traveled, and maintenance of inter-aircraft separation. We find that although our policies require only locally coordinated entry, traversal, and exit behaviors, they collectively produce desirable traffic flows through the corridor network.
MIT CSAIL