Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces SelfCompact, a novel scaffold that empowers language model agents to autonomously determine when and how to compact their accumulated context during inference. By integrating a compaction tool with a lightweight rubric that guides the model on when to summarize or suppress content, SelfCompact effectively enhances the efficiency of context management. Empirical results across six benchmarks demonstrate that this approach not only surpasses traditional fixed-interval summarization methods but also reduces token costs significantly, achieving up to 18.1 points improvement on competitive math tasks.
SelfCompact reveals that language models can autonomously manage context decay, achieving up to 18.1 points improvement in performance while cutting token costs by 30-70%.
Long agent traces composed of chains of thought and tool calls accumulate stale content that anchor subsequent generations, and eventually outgrow the context window. Existing scaffolds mitigate it with fixed-interval compaction triggered at a token threshold. Such triggers pay no heed to trajectory structure, risking discard of partial results mid-derivation or mid-search. We propose SelfCompact, a scaffold that allows the model itself to decide when and how to compact. Specifically, it pairs two inference-time elements: (i) a compaction tool the model invokes to summarize the accumulated context, and (ii) a lightweight rubric specifying when to fire (a sub-task has resolved, or the trajectory is converging) and when to suppress (mid-derivation, or when stuck). Both are needed. The tool alone is unevenly used across open-weight models, often invoked at unhelpful moments or not at all; the rubric alone cannot act. Together, they elicit effective adaptive compaction without any fine-tuning or external supervision. We present empirical results on six benchmarks (competitive math and agentic search) and seven models. Our results show that SelfCompact matches or exceeds fixed-interval summarization at a fraction of the token cost, improving over a no-summarization baseline by up to 18.1 points on math and 5-9 points on agentic search at 30-70% lower per-question cost. Our results expose a meta-cognitive gap: although unprompted models cannot reliably tell when their own context is rotting, a lightweight rubric closes this gap, reframing when to compact as a capability that scaffolds can supply without training.