Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces LISDD, a framework that effectively localizes model errors in hybrid physics-data models, identifies the underlying missing mechanisms, and certifies these findings with a rigorous statistical test. By focusing on local discrepancies rather than applying a global correction, LISDD minimizes bias in physical parameters and enhances the accuracy of error localization. In controlled experiments, LISDD significantly outperformed existing methods, achieving a localization F1 score of 0.80 and maintaining a false-discovery rate that allows for reliable identification of multiple discrepancies.
LISDD reveals that localized model errors can be pinpointed and corrected with unprecedented accuracy, transforming how we diagnose discrepancies in hybrid models.
Hybrid models combine trusted physics with data-driven correction, but a physical model is rarely wrong everywhere or in the same way. The key diagnostic question is local: where does the model fail, what missing mechanism explains the failure, and is the evidence statistically real? Existing sparse-discovery and discrepancy-learning methods usually fit one global correction, which can spread a local error into clean regimes, bias trusted physical parameters, and provide no calibrated significance for selected terms. We introduce LISDD, Localized, Identifiable Sparse Discovery of Discrepancy, a framework that localizes model error to an operating regime, identifies a sparse symbolic form for the missing mechanism, and certifies the discovery with an exact finite-sample test. LISDD fits the known physics on an automatically detected clean regime, flags discrepant regions with a calibrated residual-energy statistic, selects the local missing term by exhaustive holdout over a candidate library, and confirms significance with a sample-split $F$-test. A false-discovery-rate extension handles multiple discrepant regions with different missing mechanisms. In controlled experiments, LISDD keeps physical-parameter bias at 0.002 versus 0.43 for global-discrepancy and black-box baselines, raises localization $F_1$ from 0.44 to 0.80, recovers the correct symbolic form with probability one, attains exact detection, and controls the multi-region false-discovery rate while recovering every planted mechanism. The result is a calibrated diagnostic tool for grey-box building-energy models when a fixed physical law silently breaks in one operating regime.
