Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the prevailing dichotomy in discussions about AI and sustainability, which either emphasizes the environmental impact of AI systems or their potential benefits. It identifies a critical gap by introducing the concept of "AI against sustainability," highlighting how the application of AI in sectors like fossil fuel extraction can exacerbate environmental harm. The authors advocate for a systemic approach that includes strengthened regulation, industry self-commitment, and collaborative dialogue to effectively address these negative impacts.
AI's role in exacerbating environmental harm is often overlooked, yet it can significantly undermine sustainability efforts across various sectors.
Current debates on AI and sustainability are dichotomised, tending to focus on either the environmental impact of AI systems themselves ("sustainability of AI") or AI's potential for environmental benefit ("AI for sustainability"). This perspective highlights a crucial gap: "AI against sustainability" - the negative environmental consequences stemming from the application of AI technologies. While AI can offer solutions, its use in sectors like fossil fuel extraction or targeted advertising can exacerbate environmental harms, often overlooked in existing discussions. We argue for a systemic understanding of these impacts, distinguishing between AI as an object and its application, and propose a three-pronged approach to tackle "AI against sustainability" by (a) strengthened regulation, (b) proactive self-commitment by industry, and (c) constructive dialogue among stakeholders. Addressing the blind spots of "AI against sustainability" requires moving beyond isolated actions and fostering collaboration across disciplines to ensure truly more sustainable AI.
