Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the effectiveness of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in multimodal tasks by evaluating 12 tasks across perception and reasoning categories using both reasoning and non-reasoning models. The findings indicate that CoT is not universally beneficial; while it enhances performance in mathematical and scientific reasoning tasks, it can degrade outcomes in perception tasks like visual grounding. Additionally, the analysis reveals that current multimodal reasoning models show only marginal improvements over original models, primarily due to a focus on mathematical reasoning that overlooks broader capabilities, with visual reasoning identified as a significant limitation.
CoT reasoning boosts verbal reasoning but falters in visual tasks, revealing a critical gap in multimodal AI capabilities.
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has become a standard method for improving reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) by eliciting step-by-step thinking, but its effectiveness in multimodal tasks remains unclear. In this paper, we aim to systematically investigate the key question: What can multimodal Chain-of-Thought reasoning do, and where and why does it fall short? To this end, we evaluate 12 multimodal tasks across perception and reasoning categories using both 14 non-reasoning models and 8 reasoning models. Our analysis reveals several important findings: (1) CoT is not a free lunch and should be used selectively depending on the specific requirements of each task. For perception tasks, CoT can lead to undesirable side effects, such as reduced performance in visual grounding and object counting. In contrast, it proves effective for reasoning tasks involving mathematical, scientific, and multi-image reasoning; (2) Compared to original models, existing open-source multimodal reasoning models often yield only marginal overall improvements, possibly due to an overemphasis on mathematical reasoning at the expense of broader capabilities; (3) Visual reasoning remains a key bottleneck for current multimodal CoT, as models exhibit a Look Light, Think Heavy pattern where verbal reflection rises and falls during reasoning, whereas visual reflection consistently diminishes. These findings suggest that while multimodal CoT handles verbal reflection relatively well, it lacks the ability to maintain deep visual introspection throughout the reasoning process.
