Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This survey systematically categorizes World Action Models (WAMs), which integrate predictive-action capabilities with varying degrees of video generation, language, and vision-language backbones. By clarifying the distinctions among related models and organizing existing works through two complementary frameworks, the authors highlight the trade-offs in design choices that impact representational richness and computational efficiency. The findings reveal a trend towards models that prioritize control over comprehensive future generation, addressing key challenges in interactability and generalization.
WAMs are evolving beyond mere video generators, revealing a critical trade-off between representational richness and computational efficiency in predictive-action modeling.
World Action Models (WAMs) are embodied predictive-action models that make a forecast of the future available to action. Recent WAMs repurpose large video generation models, and a parallel line relies on language or vision-language backbones without a video-generation core. This rapid expansion has blurred the boundary among broad world models, video generation models, action-grounded video world models, Vision-Language-Action policies, and WAMs. This survey gives the field a common account. It first clarifies these boundaries, then organizes existing works through two complementary views. The first view asks what each method is required to generate, spanning rendered futures, latent futures, and video-generation-free action reasoning. The second view decomposes each method by predictive substrate, backbone, action coupling, and deployment regime. This anatomy supports a unified discussion of interactability, causality, persistence, physical plausibility, and generalization, followed by data, evaluation, and open challenges. Across these axes, a consistent design pattern emerges: WAMs are not simply video generators with action heads, but predictive-action methods whose design choices trade representational richness against compute, memory, latency, and action-label cost. The field is moving toward methods that generate less of the future while preserving what control requires. The survey homepage is available at https://world-action-models.github.io/.
NUS